Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs WWICX
HBLAX vs WWICX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs WWICX
HBLAX vs WWICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. WWICX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Hold and WWICX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. WWICX (594M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than WWICX: HBLAX (3.13) vs WWICX (1.98). HBLAX was incepted earlier than WWICX: HBLAX (20 years) vs WWICX (7 years). WWICX (1.77) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. WWICX (67.00). WWICX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: WWICX (1000) vs HBLAX (2000). WWICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.24 vs. HBLAX (1.22). WWICX return over 5 years is better than : 8.33 vs. HBLAX (4.63).
| HBLAX | WWICX | HBLAX / WWICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.77 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.77 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.076 | 4.110 | 99% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 594M | 1,835% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.13 | 1.98 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.22 | 7.24 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.75 | 31.73 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.63 | 8.33 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement