Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLCX vs HBLRX
HBLCX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts HBLCX vs HBLRX
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.85
Change-$0.06 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.96B
Hartford Balanced Income R3
Price$15.23
Change-$0.06 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.96B
HBLCX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLCX vs. HBLRX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLCX is a Hold and HBLRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX (12B) and HBLRX (12B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . HBLRX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: HBLRX (2.88) vs HBLCX (2.58). HBLCX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: HBLCX (19 years) vs HBLRX (15 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than HBLRX (1.28). HBLCX (61.00) and HBLRX (61.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: HBLRX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.37 vs. HBLCX (2.91). HBLRX return over 5 years is better than : 15.18 vs. HBLCX (12.85).
| HBLCX | HBLRX | HBLCX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.28 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.28 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.134 | 8.435 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12B | 12B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 2.88 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.91 | 3.37 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.77 | 17.32 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.85 | 15.18 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.44 | 43.97 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers