Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLCX vs HBLRX
HBLCX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts HBLCX vs HBLRX
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.25
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.74B
Hartford Balanced Income R3
Price$14.61
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.74B
HBLCX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLCX vs. HBLRX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLCX is a StrongBuy and HBLRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX (11.7B) and HBLRX (11.7B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . HBLRX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: HBLRX (2.96) vs HBLCX (2.65). HBLCX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: HBLCX (19 years) vs HBLRX (15 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than HBLRX (1.28). HBLCX (61.00) and HBLRX (61.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: HBLRX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.15 vs. HBLCX (2.68). HBLRX return over 5 years is better than : 10.20 vs. HBLCX (7.98).
| HBLCX | HBLRX | HBLCX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.28 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.28 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.864 | 3.036 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 11.7B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.65 | 2.96 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.68 | 3.15 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.83 | 6.26 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.98 | 10.20 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.35 | 32.40 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement