Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLCX vs HBLRX
HBLCX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts HBLCX vs HBLRX
HBLCX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLCX vs. HBLRX commentary
Jul 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLCX is a Buy and HBLRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX (11.2B) and HBLRX (11.2B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . HBLRX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: HBLRX (2.79) vs HBLCX (2.47). HBLCX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: HBLCX (20 years) vs HBLRX (16 years). HBLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than HBLRX (1.27). HBLCX (90.00) and HBLRX (90.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: HBLRX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.85 vs. HBLCX (4.34). HBLRX return over 5 years is better than : 4.35 vs. HBLCX (1.96).
| HBLCX | HBLRX | HBLCX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.27 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.27 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.235 | 4.404 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 11.2B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.47 | 2.79 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.34 | 4.85 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.32 | 19.99 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.96 | 4.35 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.55 | 34.88 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers