Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLCX vs NAARX
HBLCX vs NAARX Comparison
Open Charts HBLCX vs NAARX
HBLCX vs NAARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLCX vs. NAARX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLCX is a Buy and NAARX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. NAARX (1.42B). NAARX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: NAARX (3.28) vs HBLCX (2.45). HBLCX was incepted earlier than NAARX: HBLCX (20 years) vs NAARX (11 years). HBLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than NAARX (0.59). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. NAARX (6.00). NAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: NAARX (250) vs HBLCX (2000). NAARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.42 vs. HBLCX (3.89). NAARX return over 5 years is better than : 22.23 vs. HBLCX (1.71).
| HBLCX | NAARX | HBLCX / NAARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.59 | 280% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.59 | 280% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.585 | 5.603 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 1.42B | 790% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 3.28 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.89 | 9.42 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.36 | 33.91 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.71 | 22.23 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.80 | 53.07 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement