Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLCX vs RMRPX
HBLCX vs RMRPX Comparison
Open Charts HBLCX vs RMRPX
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.81
Change+$0.04 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.9B
American Funds Retire Inc Port-Cnsrv R4
Price$12.86
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.34B
HBLCX vs RMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLCX vs. RMRPX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLCX is a Buy and RMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. RMRPX (1.34B). RMRPX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: RMRPX (3.04) vs HBLCX (2.58). HBLCX was incepted earlier than RMRPX: HBLCX (19 years) vs RMRPX (10 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RMRPX (0.63). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMRPX (12.00). RMRPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: RMRPX (250) vs HBLCX (2000). RMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.27 vs. HBLCX (2.17). RMRPX return over 5 years is better than : 26.32 vs. HBLCX (14.26).
| HBLCX | RMRPX | HBLCX / RMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.63 | 260% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.63 | 260% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.529 | 11.577 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 1.34B | 891% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 3.04 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.17 | 9.27 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.10 | 30.59 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.26 | 26.32 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.95 | 52.61 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers