Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLCX vs SPBAX
HBLCX vs SPBAX Comparison
Open Charts HBLCX vs SPBAX
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.78
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.95B
DWS Multi-Asset Conservative Allc S
Price$13.66
Change+$0.04 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.66M
HBLCX vs SPBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLCX vs. SPBAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLCX is a StrongBuy and SPBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. SPBAX (60.7M). SPBAX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: SPBAX (2.89) vs HBLCX (2.58). HBLCX was incepted earlier than SPBAX: HBLCX (19 years) vs SPBAX (29 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than SPBAX (0.97). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. SPBAX (53.00). HBLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SPBAX: HBLCX (2000) vs SPBAX (2500). SPBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.83 vs. HBLCX (3.12). HBLCX return over 5 years is better than : 12.24 vs. SPBAX (10.69).
| HBLCX | SPBAX | HBLCX / SPBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.78 | 210% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.97 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.624 | 7.254 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12B | 60.7M | 19,769% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 2.89 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.12 | 4.83 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.43 | 18.97 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.24 | 10.69 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.89 | 42.33 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement