Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLCX vs WHGOX
HBLCX vs WHGOX Comparison
Open Charts HBLCX vs WHGOX
HBLCX vs WHGOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. WHGOX (612M). WHGOX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: WHGOX (3.43) vs HBLCX (2.49). HBLCX was incepted earlier than WHGOX: HBLCX (20 years) vs WHGOX (4 years). HBLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than WHGOX (0.77). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. WHGOX (67.00). HBLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGOX: HBLCX (2000) vs WHGOX (1000000). WHGOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.29 vs. HBLCX (5.80).
| HBLCX | WHGOX | HBLCX / WHGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.77 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.77 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.107 | 6.889 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 612M | 1,830% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.49 | 3.43 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.80 | 19.29 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.53 | 40.05 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.37 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.32 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement