Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLCX vs WHGOX
HBLCX vs WHGOX Comparison
Open Charts HBLCX vs WHGOX
HBLCX vs WHGOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. WHGOX (593M). WHGOX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: WHGOX (2.86) vs HBLCX (2.45). HBLCX was incepted earlier than WHGOX: HBLCX (20 years) vs WHGOX (4 years). HBLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than WHGOX (0.77). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. WHGOX (67.00). HBLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGOX: HBLCX (2000) vs WHGOX (1000000). WHGOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.24 vs. HBLCX (4.48).
| HBLCX | WHGOX | HBLCX / WHGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.77 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.77 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.235 | 4.539 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 593M | 1,872% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 2.86 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.48 | 12.24 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.24 | 33.00 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.52 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.64 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement