Ad is loading...
HBLCX vs WWIAX
HBLCX vs WWIAX Comparison
Open Charts HBLCX vs WWIAX
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$13.83
Change+$0.06 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.5B
Westwood Income Opportunity A
Price$11.48
Change+$0.08 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets496.07M
HBLCX vs WWIAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLCX vs. WWIAX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLCX is a Buy and WWIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. WWIAX (496M). WWIAX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: WWIAX (4.21) vs HBLCX (2.64). HBLCX was incepted earlier than WWIAX: HBLCX (19 years) vs WWIAX (17 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than WWIAX (0.99). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. WWIAX (57.00). WWIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: WWIAX (1000) vs HBLCX (2000). WWIAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to HBLCX: WWIAX (5000) vs HBLCX (2000). WWIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.99 vs. HBLCX (1.71). WWIAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.69 vs. HBLCX (11.61).
| HBLCX | WWIAX | HBLCX / WWIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.99 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.99 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.391 | -3.681 | 11% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | 5000 | 40% |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 496M | 2,319% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 4.21 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.71 | 3.99 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.79 | 8.88 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.61 | 12.69 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.33 | -3.04 | -669% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...