Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLCX vs WWICX
HBLCX vs WWICX Comparison
Open Charts HBLCX vs WWICX
HBLCX vs WWICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLCX vs. WWICX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLCX is a Buy and WWICX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. WWICX (603M). HBLCX pays higher dividends than WWICX: HBLCX (2.45) vs WWICX (1.89). HBLCX was incepted earlier than WWICX: HBLCX (20 years) vs WWICX (7 years). WWICX (1.77) is less costly to investors than HBLCX (1.65). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. WWICX (67.00). WWICX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: WWICX (1000) vs HBLCX (2000). WWICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.93 vs. HBLCX (3.96). WWICX return over 5 years is better than : 10.37 vs. HBLCX (1.89).
| HBLCX | WWICX | HBLCX / WWICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.77 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.77 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.443 | 5.683 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 603M | 1,841% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 1.89 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.96 | 11.93 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.05 | 35.19 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.89 | 10.37 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement