Ad is loading...
HBLFX vs PCCEX
HBLFX vs PCCEX Comparison
Open Charts HBLFX vs PCCEX
Hartford Balanced Income F
Price$14.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.53B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv R6
Price$10.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets553.17M
HBLFX vs PCCEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLFX vs. PCCEX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLFX is a Hold and PCCEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. PCCEX (553M). PCCEX (3.83) and HBLFX (3.69) have matching dividends . HBLFX was incepted earlier than PCCEX: HBLFX (8 years) vs PCCEX (13 years). PCCEX (0.67) is less costly to investors than HBLFX (0.56). PCCEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. HBLFX (61.00). PCCEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLFX: PCCEX (0) vs HBLFX (1000000). PCCEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.90 vs. HBLFX (4.37). HBLFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.74 vs. PCCEX (9.86).
| HBLFX | PCCEX | HBLFX / PCCEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.67 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.67 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.108 | -1.539 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 553M | 2,080% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.69 | 3.83 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.37 | 4.90 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.32 | 5.70 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.74 | 9.86 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers