Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLFX vs PCCEX
HBLFX vs PCCEX Comparison
Open Charts HBLFX vs PCCEX
HBLFX vs PCCEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLFX vs. PCCEX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLFX is a Buy and PCCEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. PCCEX (838M). HBLFX pays higher dividends than PCCEX: HBLFX (3.46) vs PCCEX (3.02). HBLFX was incepted earlier than PCCEX: HBLFX (9 years) vs PCCEX (14 years). PCCEX (0.64) is less costly to investors than HBLFX (0.56). PCCEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. HBLFX (90.00). PCCEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLFX: PCCEX (0) vs HBLFX (1000000). PCCEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.51 vs. HBLFX (5.77). PCCEX return over 5 years is better than : 9.27 vs. HBLFX (7.50).
| HBLFX | PCCEX | HBLFX / PCCEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.64 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.64 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.871 | 3.067 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 838M | 1,325% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.46 | 3.02 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.77 | 7.51 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.30 | 28.93 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.50 | 9.27 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement