Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLFX vs PCCEX
HBLFX vs PCCEX Comparison
Open Charts HBLFX vs PCCEX
HBLFX vs PCCEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLFX vs. PCCEX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLFX is a Hold and PCCEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. PCCEX (835M). HBLFX pays higher dividends than PCCEX: HBLFX (3.43) vs PCCEX (2.99). HBLFX was incepted earlier than PCCEX: HBLFX (10 years) vs PCCEX (14 years). PCCEX (0.64) is less costly to investors than HBLFX (0.56). PCCEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. HBLFX (90.00). PCCEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLFX: PCCEX (0) vs HBLFX (1000000). PCCEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.47 vs. HBLFX (2.01). PCCEX return over 5 years is better than : 8.78 vs. HBLFX (6.59).
| HBLFX | PCCEX | HBLFX / PCCEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.64 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.64 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.171 | 2.887 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 835M | 1,293% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.43 | 2.99 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.01 | 3.47 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.56 | 30.28 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.59 | 8.78 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.74 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement