Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLRX vs IIFSX
HBLRX vs IIFSX Comparison
Open Charts HBLRX vs IIFSX
HBLRX vs IIFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLRX vs. IIFSX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLRX is a Buy and IIFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. IIFSX (255M). IIFSX pays higher dividends than HBLRX: IIFSX (3.09) vs HBLRX (2.76). HBLRX was incepted earlier than IIFSX: HBLRX (16 years) vs IIFSX (20 years). HBLRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than IIFSX (1.20). IIFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. HBLRX (90.00). HBLRX (0) and IIFSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HBLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.41 vs. IIFSX (1.77). IIFSX return over 5 years is better than : 10.64 vs. HBLRX (4.10).
| HBLRX | IIFSX | HBLRX / IIFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.83 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.20 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.791 | 4.397 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 255M | 4,392% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.76 | 3.09 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.41 | 1.77 | 249% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.93 | 30.83 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.10 | 10.64 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.22 | 38.48 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement