Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLRX vs MACVX
HBLRX vs MACVX Comparison
Open Charts HBLRX vs MACVX
HBLRX vs MACVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLRX vs. MACVX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLRX is a Buy and MACVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. MACVX (3.37B). HBLRX pays higher dividends than MACVX: HBLRX (2.74) vs MACVX (2.36). HBLRX was incepted earlier than MACVX: HBLRX (16 years) vs MACVX (24 years). MACVX (1.58) is less costly to investors than HBLRX (1.27). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. MACVX (4.00). HBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than MACVX: HBLRX (0) vs MACVX (1000). HBLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.21 vs. MACVX (0.14). HBLRX return over 5 years is better than : 3.00 vs. MACVX (1.83).
| HBLRX | MACVX | HBLRX / MACVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.58 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.58 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.434 | 2.406 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 3.37B | 320% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.74 | 2.36 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.21 | 0.14 | 862% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.66 | 16.76 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.00 | 1.83 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.49 | 32.55 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement