Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLRX vs WWICX
HBLRX vs WWICX Comparison
Open Charts HBLRX vs WWICX
HBLRX vs WWICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLRX vs. WWICX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLRX is a Hold and WWICX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. WWICX (594M). HBLRX pays higher dividends than WWICX: HBLRX (2.74) vs WWICX (1.98). HBLRX was incepted earlier than WWICX: HBLRX (16 years) vs WWICX (7 years). WWICX (1.77) is less costly to investors than HBLRX (1.27). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. WWICX (67.00). HBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWICX: HBLRX (0) vs WWICX (1000). WWICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.24 vs. HBLRX (0.88). WWICX return over 5 years is better than : 8.33 vs. HBLRX (2.74).
| HBLRX | WWICX | HBLRX / WWICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.77 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.77 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.850 | 4.110 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 594M | 1,835% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.74 | 1.98 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.88 | 7.24 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.49 | 31.73 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.74 | 8.33 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement