Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLSX vs IIFTX
HBLSX vs IIFTX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs IIFTX
HBLSX vs IIFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. IIFTX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a Buy and IIFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. IIFTX (250M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than IIFTX: HBLSX (3.02) vs IIFTX (2.74). HBLSX was incepted earlier than IIFTX: HBLSX (16 years) vs IIFTX (20 years). IIFTX (1.20) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). IIFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. HBLSX (90.00). HBLSX (0) and IIFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HBLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.96 vs. IIFTX (1.04). IIFTX return over 5 years is better than : 7.89 vs. HBLSX (4.45).
| HBLSX | IIFTX | HBLSX / IIFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.83 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.20 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.166 | 3.268 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 250M | 4,400% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.02 | 2.74 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.96 | 1.04 | 380% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.13 | 28.49 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.45 | 7.89 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.33 | 35.29 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers