Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLSX vs MACVX
HBLSX vs MACVX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs MACVX
HBLSX vs MACVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. MACVX commentary
Jun 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a Buy and MACVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. MACVX (3.56B). HBLSX pays higher dividends than MACVX: HBLSX (3.08) vs MACVX (2.41). HBLSX was incepted earlier than MACVX: HBLSX (16 years) vs MACVX (24 years). MACVX (1.58) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. MACVX (5.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MACVX: HBLSX (0) vs MACVX (1000). HBLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.93 vs. MACVX (3.61). HBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 5.77 vs. MACVX (3.57).
| HBLSX | MACVX | HBLSX / MACVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.58 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.58 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.539 | 2.503 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 3.56B | 312% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.08 | 2.41 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.93 | 3.61 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.99 | 15.20 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.77 | 3.57 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.87 | 37.32 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement