Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLSX vs RMLCX
HBLSX vs RMLCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs RMLCX
HBLSX vs RMLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. RMLCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a Buy and RMLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. RMLCX (119M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than RMLCX: HBLSX (3.04) vs RMLCX (2.78). HBLSX was incepted earlier than RMLCX: HBLSX (16 years) vs RMLCX (27 years). RMLCX (2.11) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. RMLCX (21.00). HBLSX (0) and RMLCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.90 vs. HBLSX (5.37). HBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 5.46 vs. RMLCX (4.05).
| HBLSX | RMLCX | HBLSX / RMLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.79 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 2.11 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.611 | 4.088 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 119M | 9,328% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.04 | 2.78 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.37 | 9.90 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.89 | 27.35 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.46 | 4.05 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.76 | 14.68 | 264% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers