Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLSX vs TWSCX
HBLSX vs TWSCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs TWSCX
HBLSX vs TWSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. TWSCX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a Buy and TWSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. TWSCX (279M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than TWSCX: HBLSX (3.08) vs TWSCX (1.92). HBLSX was incepted earlier than TWSCX: HBLSX (16 years) vs TWSCX (30 years). TWSCX (1.13) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). TWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. HBLSX (90.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than TWSCX: HBLSX (0) vs TWSCX (2500). TWSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.36 vs. HBLSX (5.57). HBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 5.29 vs. TWSCX (2.44).
| HBLSX | TWSCX | HBLSX / TWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.83 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.13 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.884 | 3.558 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 279M | 4,014% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.08 | 1.92 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.57 | 6.36 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.96 | 20.44 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.29 | 2.44 | 217% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.82 | 25.23 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers