Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLSX vs USBLX
HBLSX vs USBLX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs USBLX
HBLSX vs USBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. USBLX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a Buy and USBLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. USBLX (922M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than USBLX: HBLSX (3.04) vs USBLX (2.26). HBLSX was incepted earlier than USBLX: HBLSX (16 years) vs USBLX (38 years). HBLSX (0.96) is less costly to investors than USBLX (0.52). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. USBLX (16.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than USBLX: HBLSX (0) vs USBLX (3000). USBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.45 vs. HBLSX (5.37). USBLX return over 5 years is better than : 34.17 vs. HBLSX (5.46).
| HBLSX | USBLX | HBLSX / USBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.52 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.52 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.611 | 5.553 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 3000 | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 922M | 1,204% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.04 | 2.26 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.37 | 12.45 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.89 | 37.55 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.46 | 34.17 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.76 | 102.07 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers