Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLSX vs USBLX
HBLSX vs USBLX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs USBLX
HBLSX vs USBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. USBLX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a Hold and USBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. USBLX (932M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than USBLX: HBLSX (3.08) vs USBLX (2.01). HBLSX was incepted earlier than USBLX: HBLSX (16 years) vs USBLX (37 years). HBLSX (0.96) is less costly to investors than USBLX (0.50). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. USBLX (17.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than USBLX: HBLSX (0) vs USBLX (3000). USBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.70 vs. HBLSX (6.60). USBLX return over 5 years is better than : 39.52 vs. HBLSX (5.17).
| HBLSX | USBLX | HBLSX / USBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.50 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.50 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.264 | 6.502 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 3000 | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 932M | 1,202% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.08 | 2.01 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.60 | 17.70 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.11 | 44.15 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.17 | 39.52 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.46 | 107.20 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement