Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLSX vs WHGIX
HBLSX vs WHGIX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs WHGIX
HBLSX vs WHGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. WHGIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a Hold and WHGIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. WHGIX (601M). WHGIX pays higher dividends than HBLSX: WHGIX (3.35) vs HBLSX (3.08). HBLSX was incepted earlier than WHGIX: HBLSX (16 years) vs WHGIX (21 years). HBLSX (0.96) is less costly to investors than WHGIX (0.84). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. WHGIX (67.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGIX: HBLSX (0) vs WHGIX (100000). WHGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.33 vs. HBLSX (5.86). WHGIX return over 5 years is better than : 14.35 vs. HBLSX (6.36).
| HBLSX | WHGIX | HBLSX / WHGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.84 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.84 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.608 | 5.525 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 601M | 1,847% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.08 | 3.35 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.86 | 16.33 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.07 | 37.19 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.36 | 14.35 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.96 | 23.00 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers