Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLSX vs WHGIX
HBLSX vs WHGIX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs WHGIX
HBLSX vs WHGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. WHGIX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a Buy and WHGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. WHGIX (593M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than WHGIX: HBLSX (3.04) vs WHGIX (2.77). HBLSX was incepted earlier than WHGIX: HBLSX (16 years) vs WHGIX (21 years). HBLSX (0.96) is less costly to investors than WHGIX (0.84). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. WHGIX (67.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGIX: HBLSX (0) vs WHGIX (100000). WHGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.13 vs. HBLSX (5.37). WHGIX return over 5 years is better than : 12.79 vs. HBLSX (5.46).
| HBLSX | WHGIX | HBLSX / WHGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.84 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.84 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.611 | 4.565 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 593M | 1,872% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.04 | 2.77 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.37 | 12.13 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.89 | 32.73 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.46 | 12.79 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.76 | 18.97 | 204% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers