Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBMCX vs RPMGX
HBMCX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts HBMCX vs RPMGX
HBMCX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBMCX vs. RPMGX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBMCX is a Buy and RPMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 23.2B vs. HBMCX (736M). HBMCX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . HBMCX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: HBMCX (27 years) vs RPMGX (34 years). HBMCX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.77). HBMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RPMGX (31.50). HBMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: HBMCX (0) vs RPMGX (2500). RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.62 vs. HBMCX (-11.98). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : -16.15 vs. HBMCX (-47.85).
| HBMCX | RPMGX | HBMCX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.77 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.77 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.565 | 2.406 | 356% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 736M | 23.2B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.98 | 2.62 | -458% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.85 | 4.00 | -246% |
| Returns for 5 years | -47.85 | -16.15 | 296% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.60 | 32.51 | -100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement