Regional banks remain a focal point for investors seeking exposure to Main Street economic activity, and few comparisons better illustrate the diversity within this sector than Horizon Bancorp, Inc. (HBNC) versus PCB Bancorp (PCB). Both are publicly traded community bank holding companies listed on the NASDAQ, yet they operate at different scales, in different regions, and with notably different recent earnings trajectories. This stock comparison is relevant for value-oriented investors, dividend seekers, and traders evaluating relative performance within the financial sector. Understanding how these two institutions compare across growth, profitability, risk, and market sentiment can help clarify the trade-offs embedded in each name.
Horizon Bancorp, Inc. is a bank holding company headquartered in Michigan City, Indiana, operating through its primary subsidiary, Horizon Bank. Founded in 1873, the institution provides a full suite of commercial and retail banking services — including lending, treasury management, wealth advisory, and trust services — across northwestern Indiana and southwestern Michigan.
In recent months, HBNC shares have attracted renewed investor interest following an analyst upgrade that propelled the stock to a new 52-week high near $20.66. The company's second quarter 2026 earnings report showed earnings per share (EPS) of $0.49, slightly below consensus estimates, yet the underlying core banking franchise continued to demonstrate strength. Notably, the bank achieved seven consecutive quarters of net interest margin (NIM — the difference between interest income earned and interest paid to depositors, expressed as a percentage of earning assets) expansion through mid-2025. Loan growth has been robust, particularly in the commercial segment, and credit quality metrics remain healthy, with annualized net charge-offs (NCO — the percentage of loans written off as uncollectible) holding at very low levels. However, a substantial non-recurring loss in the third quarter of 2025 related to balance sheet repositioning continues to weigh on trailing twelve-month profitability metrics, keeping the trailing P/E ratio in negative territory and clouding the headline earnings picture.
PCB Bancorp is the holding company for PCB Bank (formerly Pacific City Bank), headquartered in Los Angeles, California. The bank primarily serves small to middle-market businesses and individuals across Southern California, with deep roots in the Korean-American business community. Its service offerings span demand deposits, savings and money market accounts, certificates of deposit (CDs), commercial and residential lending, Small Business Administration (SBA) lending, and trade finance.
PCB has delivered a notably consistent earnings profile in recent quarters. For full-year 2025, the company reported net income of $37.2 million, or $2.58 per diluted share — a 48% increase over the prior year. Its NIM held steady at approximately 3.28% to 3.29%, and the efficiency ratio (a measure of non-interest expenses as a percentage of revenue, where lower is better) remained competitive in the low-50% range. In recent weeks, PCB shares have traded near the $28 level, with year-to-date gains close to 29%, supported by strong loan demand and disciplined expense management. The bank's capital position remains solid, with a Tier 1 leverage ratio (a key measure of a bank's core capital strength relative to its total assets) of 11.89% and tangible common equity to tangible assets of 9.78%. With a trailing P/E ratio of roughly 9.7, PCB currently trades at a valuation that many market participants view as reasonable relative to its earnings power.
For traders seeking a data-driven edge in comparing stocks like HBNC and PCB, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate shifting market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs, and other instruments — but only the strongest performers earn placement in this featured section. The bots span a wide range of trading styles, including swing trading, trend following, breakout strategies, and mean-reversion approaches, with some targeting short-term moves while others hold positions for weeks. Performance statistics vary, with top bots demonstrating win rates above 60% and annualized returns that have historically ranged from the mid-teens to over 40%, depending on strategy and market environment. Each bot operates with its own distinct logic, risk parameters, and ticker universe. Browse the Trending AI Robots section to explore which algorithms currently align with your trading objectives.
When placed side by side, HBNC and PCB reveal a classic trade-off between scale and consistency. HBNC brings roughly $6.4 billion in total assets and a market capitalization north of $1 billion, positioning it as a mid-sized regional player with greater operational breadth. PCB, with approximately $3.3 billion in assets, operates at roughly half the size, yet has posted far more predictable earnings over the past several quarters.
On profitability, PCB's trailing return on average assets (ROAA — net income divided by average total assets, measuring how efficiently a bank uses its asset base) of 1.15% comfortably exceeds the 1.00% threshold generally viewed as a benchmark for well-run community banks, while HBNC's headline ROAA is distorted by its one-time loss. PCB's return on average tangible common equity (ROATCE — a measure of profitability relative to tangible shareholder capital) of roughly 12% also stands out.
Risk considerations differ meaningfully. HBNC carries a beta of approximately 0.82, indicating moderate sensitivity to broader market moves, whereas PCB's beta of roughly 0.49 suggests markedly lower systematic risk — potentially attractive in volatile market environments. However, PCB's geographic concentration in Southern California exposes it to regional real estate cycles and a competitive banking landscape, while HBNC's Midwest footprint offers diversification across more stable, less densely banked markets.
Momentum and sentiment present a mixed picture: PCB's year-to-date price gain of roughly 29% outpaces HBNC's approximately 19%, yet HBNC recently received an analyst upgrade and hit a new 52-week high, signaling that some market participants see a turnaround narrative building around the Indiana-based bank's core earnings recovery.
Based on observable trend consistency, earnings stability, valuation clarity, and relative risk metrics, a Tickeron AI-driven analysis would likely tilt in favor of PCB in the current market environment. PCB's cleaner earnings profile — free of the large non-recurring charges that cloud HBNC's trailing results — provides AI algorithms with more reliable data for pattern recognition and trend detection. Its lower beta, consistent NIM, attractive P/E multiple, and strong year-to-date momentum all contribute to a more favorable risk-reward profile from a probabilistic standpoint. That said, HBNC's recent analyst upgrade, expanding NIM trajectory, and potential for mean-reversion as one-time losses roll off the trailing twelve-month calculation could make it an interesting candidate for AI bots employing contrarian or turnaround strategies. The choice between these two regional banks ultimately depends on whether one prioritizes proven earnings consistency or a potential recovery story — and different AI trading bots may arrive at different conclusions depending on their programmed criteria.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HBNC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePCB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HBNC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PCB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
HBNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.74% price change this week, while PCB (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.41% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.56%.
HBNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
PCB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| HBNC | PCB | HBNC / PCB | |
| Capitalization | 1.05B | 397M | 263% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.330 | 31.694 | 74% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.73 | 9.61 | 143% |
| Revenue | -27.12M | 119M | -23% |
| Total Cash | 68.4M | 25.3M | 270% |
| Total Debt | 316M | 68.3M | 463% |
HBNC | PCB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 88 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 54 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PCB's Valuation (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HBNC (31). This means that PCB’s stock grew similarly to HBNC’s over the last 12 months.
PCB's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBNC (71). This means that PCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBNC’s over the last 12 months.
PCB's SMR Rating (58) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBNC (96). This means that PCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBNC’s over the last 12 months.
PCB's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HBNC (43). This means that PCB’s stock grew similarly to HBNC’s over the last 12 months.
PCB's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBNC (98). This means that PCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBNC’s over the last 12 months.
| HBNC | PCB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 13 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 49% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBNC has been closely correlated with BY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBNC jumps, then BY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HBNC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBNC | 100% | +1.50% | ||
| BY - HBNC | 84% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| UVSP - HBNC | 83% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| FISI - HBNC | 82% Closely correlated | +1.55% | ||
| BUSE - HBNC | 82% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| MBWM - HBNC | 82% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PCB has been closely correlated with BY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PCB jumps, then BY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PCB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCB | 100% | -0.32% | ||
| BY - PCB | 78% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| TMP - PCB | 77% Closely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| BFST - PCB | 77% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| HBNC - PCB | 76% Closely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| MCBS - PCB | 76% Closely correlated | -5.22% | ||
More | ||||