Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBSGX vs WCMNX
HBSGX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HBSGX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth HLS IB
Price$21.46
Change+$0.11 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets540.86M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.39
Change+$0.22 (+1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.58M
HBSGX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBSGX vs. WCMNX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBSGX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBSGX has more cash in the bank: 541M vs. WCMNX (44.6M). HBSGX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HBSGX (2.83) vs WCMNX (0.00). HBSGX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HBSGX (23 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HBSGX (0.90). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HBSGX (69.00). HBSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: HBSGX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.35 vs. HBSGX (-15.54). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 19.45 vs. HBSGX (-19.92).
| HBSGX | WCMNX | HBSGX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 2.04 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -18.967 | 5.516 | -344% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 541M | 44.6M | 1,213% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.54 | 6.35 | -245% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.66 | 27.40 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.92 | 19.45 | -102% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement