Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBSGX vs WCMNX
HBSGX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HBSGX vs WCMNX
HBSGX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBSGX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jun 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBSGX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBSGX has more cash in the bank: 626M vs. WCMNX (52M). HBSGX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HBSGX (2.32) vs WCMNX (0.00). HBSGX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HBSGX (24 years) vs WCMNX (7 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HBSGX (0.91). WCMNX (89.00) and HBSGX (86.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: HBSGX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.82 vs. HBSGX (6.25). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -6.26 vs. HBSGX (-28.85).
| HBSGX | WCMNX | HBSGX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.04 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.681 | 8.339 | 200% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 626M | 52M | 1,204% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.25 | 20.82 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.03 | 27.99 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.85 | -6.26 | 461% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers