Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBSGX vs WCMNX
HBSGX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HBSGX vs WCMNX
HBSGX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBSGX vs. WCMNX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBSGX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBSGX has more cash in the bank: 537M vs. WCMNX (46.1M). HBSGX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . HBSGX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HBSGX (24 years) vs WCMNX (7 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HBSGX (0.91). WCMNX (89.00) and HBSGX (86.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: HBSGX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). HBSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. WCMNX (2.43). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -10.49 vs. HBSGX (-31.18).
| HBSGX | WCMNX | HBSGX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.04 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.856 | 2.657 | 220% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 537M | 46.1M | 1,165% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.51 | 2.43 | 433% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.11 | 22.23 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.18 | -10.49 | 297% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement