HCA Healthcare and Universal Health Services are two of the largest publicly traded hospital and healthcare facility operators in the United States. Although both generate the bulk of their revenue from acute care hospitals, their portfolios, geographic footprints, and growth profiles differ considerably, making this a useful stock comparison for investors weighing scale and momentum against valuation and specialized exposure. This analysis reviews recent market activity, operating results, and sentiment shifts for HCA and UHS, and examines how their relative market positioning has evolved in the current environment.
HCA Healthcare is the largest for-profit hospital operator in the United States, operating 190 hospitals and approximately 2,500 ambulatory care sites—including surgery centers, freestanding emergency rooms, and urgent care clinics—across 19 states and the United Kingdom. Its scale and dense regional networks give it significant negotiating power and operational leverage.
Recent market activity has been favorable for HCA. In its most recent quarterly report, the company posted adjusted earnings per share (EPS) that exceeded analyst expectations on the back of steady same-facility admission growth, while full-year revenue rose roughly 7% and adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) expanded by double digits. Management also authorized a substantial new share repurchase program and raised its dividend, signaling confidence in cash generation. The stock has traded near multi-year highs in recent weeks, reflecting investor optimism around resilient volumes and disciplined expense management.
Universal Health Services operates a more concentrated portfolio centered on two segments: acute care hospitals and behavioral health facilities. The company runs 29 acute care hospitals, 338 inpatient behavioral health facilities, and 61 outpatient facilities across 39 states, Washington D.C., the United Kingdom, and Puerto Rico. Its scale in behavioral health—a specialized, less commoditized area of care—differentiates it from larger acute-care peers.
UHS has posted solid but comparatively mixed recent results. Quarterly revenue grew about 9% year over year, driven by higher net revenue per admission across both segments, while adjusted EPS rose sharply on an annual basis but came in slightly below consensus amid softer-than-expected volumes and elevated operating costs. The company continued its long-running share repurchase program and issued forward guidance implying continued revenue and EBITDA growth. Its shares have appreciated over the past year but at a more measured pace than some large-cap peers, keeping its valuation notably lower.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's best-performing automated trading bots for current market conditions. While Tickeron offers hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, only a small subset earns a place in this featured section. These bots vary widely in trading style, strategy, timeframe, historical performance, and the universe of tickers they trade—ranging from short-term momentum strategies to longer-horizon trend-following approaches. Some bots target high-turnover intraday setups, while others focus on sustained directional moves in large-cap names such as HCA and UHS. Investors exploring data-driven approaches can review the Trending AI Robots to identify strategies aligned with their own objectives.
Business model is a key point of contrast. HCA relies on broad geographic diversification and an extensive ambulatory network, whereas UHS derives meaningful exposure from behavioral health, a segment with steadier, less cyclical demand characteristics. Growth drivers also differ: HCA emphasizes network expansion and outpatient investment, while UHS leans on pricing improvements and its specialized behavioral footprint.
On valuation, the gap is pronounced. UHS trades at a forward price-to-earnings multiple near the single digits—well below HCA's mid-teens multiple and below its own historical median. Recent momentum, however, has favored HCA, whose shares have responded to stronger earnings beats and a larger capital-return program. Both face common risk factors, including labor costs and policy exposure to Medicaid supplemental payments and expiring exchange subsidies, but UHS's more concentrated footprint and lower liquidity buffer leave it comparatively more sensitive to reimbursement changes.
Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely favor HCA for its more consistent trend consistency, stronger recent earnings momentum, and larger scale relative to the same sector headwinds. HCA's steady volume growth, expanding margins, and substantial buyback authorization support a more constructive relative positioning. That said, UHS presents a credible value case given its discounted valuation and differentiated behavioral health exposure, and could become more attractive if sentiment or momentum shifts. Any AI-driven assessment remains probabilistic, reflecting the balance of current catalysts and positioning rather than a definitive forecast.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
HCA | UHS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 46 | 82 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HCA's Valuation (9) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as UHS (11). This means that HCA’s stock grew similarly to UHS’s over the last 12 months.
HCA's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UHS (82). This means that HCA’s stock grew somewhat faster than UHS’s over the last 12 months.
HCA's SMR Rating (45) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as UHS (45). This means that HCA’s stock grew similarly to UHS’s over the last 12 months.
UHS's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as HCA (48). This means that UHS’s stock grew similarly to HCA’s over the last 12 months.
HCA's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as UHS (80). This means that HCA’s stock grew similarly to UHS’s over the last 12 months.
| HCA | UHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 63% | 7 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 68% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HCA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while UHS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HCA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UHS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
HCA (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а +0.54% price change this week, while UHS (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was -0.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -2.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.02%.
HCA is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
UHS is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCA has been closely correlated with UHS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HCA jumps, then UHS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HCA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCA | 100% | +1.93% | ||
| UHS - HCA | 66% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| THC - HCA | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| ENSG - HCA | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| SGRY - HCA | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
| CON - HCA | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.57% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UHS has been closely correlated with HCA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UHS jumps, then HCA could also see price increases.