It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HCA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUSPH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HCA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USPH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
HCA (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -2.95% price change this week, while USPH (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -5.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -3.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1650.84%.
HCA is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
USPH is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
HCA | USPH | HCA / USPH | |
Capitalization | 88.2B | 1.69B | 5,219% |
EBITDA | 12.7B | 74.4M | 17,070% |
Gain YTD | 29.786 | -0.001 | -2,061,335% |
P/E Ratio | 17.40 | 87.62 | 20% |
Revenue | 65B | 605M | 10,744% |
Total Cash | 935M | 153M | 611% |
Total Debt | 41.9B | 259M | 16,178% |
HCA | USPH | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 44 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 23 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HCA's Valuation (7) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as USPH (34) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that HCA’s stock grew similarly to USPH’s over the last 12 months.
HCA's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is significantly better than the same rating for USPH (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that HCA’s stock grew significantly faster than USPH’s over the last 12 months.
HCA's SMR Rating (44) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USPH (84) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that HCA’s stock grew somewhat faster than USPH’s over the last 12 months.
USPH's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as HCA (53) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that USPH’s stock grew similarly to HCA’s over the last 12 months.
USPH's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as HCA (34) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that USPH’s stock grew similarly to HCA’s over the last 12 months.
HCA | USPH | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago60% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago66% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago49% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago66% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago70% | 11 days ago66% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago55% | 2 days ago66% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago78% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago67% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HCA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HCA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HCA | 100% | -0.35% | ||
THC - HCA | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
UHS - HCA | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
SGRY - HCA | 51% Loosely correlated | -13.75% | ||
EHC - HCA | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
USPH - HCA | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USPH has been loosely correlated with SEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USPH jumps, then SEM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To USPH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
USPH | 100% | -0.25% | ||
SEM - USPH | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.21% | ||
NHC - USPH | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
ADUS - USPH | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.10% | ||
ENSG - USPH | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
PNTG - USPH | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.50% | ||
More |