HCMA
Price
$10.28
Change
-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
346.9M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
PLMIU
Price
$10.89
Change
+$1.19 (+12.27%)
Updated
Sep 13 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HCMA vs PLMIU

Header iconHCMA vs PLMIU Comparison
Open Charts HCMA vs PLMIUBanner chart's image
Hcm III Acquisition
Price$10.28
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Volume$293
Capitalization346.9M
Plum Acquisition
Price$10.89
Change+$1.19 (+12.27%)
Volume$2.5K
CapitalizationN/A
HCMA vs PLMIU Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HCMA vs. PLMIU commentary
Oct 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMA is a Hold and PLMIU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 27, 2025
Stock price -- (HCMA: $10.28 vs. PLMIU: $10.89)
Brand notoriety: HCMA and PLMIU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HCMA: 0% vs. PLMIU: 100%
Market capitalization -- HCMA: $346.9M vs. PLMIU: $0
HCMA [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $346.9M. PLMIU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $182.99M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HCMA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLMIU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HCMA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PLMIU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HCMA is a better buy in the long-term than PLMIU.

Price Growth

HCMA (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.13% price change this week, while PLMIU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +6.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +39.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.18%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+6.85% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCMAPLMIUHCMA / PLMIU
Capitalization347MN/A-
EBITDAN/A-2.67M-
Gain YTDN/A0.000-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A32.8K-
Total DebtN/A1.25M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PLMIU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VCLN25.320.70
+2.86%
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF
SAMT38.400.38
+1.00%
Strategas Macro Thematic Opp ETF
USPX59.470.40
+0.68%
Franklin US Equity Index ETF
VTEL104.530.14
+0.13%
Vanguard Long-Term Tx-Exm Bd ETF
PBTP26.24-0.01
-0.04%
Invesco 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF

HCMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCMA has been loosely correlated with NPWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HCMA jumps, then NPWR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCMA
1D Price
Change %
HCMA100%
-0.16%
NPWR - HCMA
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.23%
HCMAU - HCMA
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
WELNF - HCMA
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLMIU - HCMA
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SZZL - HCMA
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PLMIU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLMIU has been loosely correlated with CXAI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLMIU jumps, then CXAI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLMIU
1D Price
Change %
PLMIU100%
N/A
CXAI - PLMIU
50%
Loosely correlated
+3.15%
HCMAU - PLMIU
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
CMCAF - PLMIU
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RRACF - PLMIU
36%
Loosely correlated
+12.03%
ALCYU - PLMIU
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More