Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMAX vs RMEBX
HCMAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HCMAX vs RMEBX
HCMAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HCMAX (73.3M). HCMAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HCMAX (2.18) vs RMEBX (0.99). HCMAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HCMAX (26 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) and HCMAX (1.03) have similar cost to investors . HCMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMAX: RMEBX (250) vs HCMAX (5000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.65 vs. HCMAX (0.14). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. HCMAX (-7.76).
| HCMAX | RMEBX | HCMAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.07 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.660 | 8.448 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.3M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.18 | 0.99 | 220% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | 4.65 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.20 | 34.88 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.76 | 34.68 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.01 | 92.45 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement