Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMAX vs RMFCX
HCMAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HCMAX vs RMFCX
HCMAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HCMAX (73.3M). HCMAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HCMAX (2.18) vs RMFCX (1.15). HCMAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HCMAX (26 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HCMAX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HCMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMAX: RMFCX (250) vs HCMAX (5000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.75 vs. HCMAX (0.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.61 vs. HCMAX (-7.76).
| HCMAX | RMFCX | HCMAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.91 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.660 | 8.539 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.3M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.18 | 1.15 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | 4.75 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.20 | 35.38 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.76 | 35.61 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.01 | 94.16 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement