Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMIX vs RGAHX
HCMIX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts HCMIX vs RGAHX
HCMIX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMIX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMIX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. HCMIX (2.08B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than HCMIX: RGAHX (0.40) vs HCMIX (0.00). HCMIX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: HCMIX (12 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). HCMIX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). HCMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 264.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMIX: RGAHX (250) vs HCMIX (50000). HCMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.55 vs. RGAHX (0.18). HCMIX return over 5 years is better than : 29.45 vs. RGAHX (13.78).
| HCMIX | RGAHX | HCMIX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.44 | 393% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.44 | 393% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.342 | 9.200 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 353B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.55 | 0.18 | 5,318% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.18 | 43.47 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.45 | 13.78 | 214% |
| Returns for 10 years | 294.81 | 106.68 | 276% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement