Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMNX vs RWIBX
HCMNX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts HCMNX vs RWIBX
HCMNX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMNX vs. RWIBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMNX is a StrongBuy and RWIBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. HCMNX (2.08B). RWIBX pays higher dividends than HCMNX: RWIBX (0.74) vs HCMNX (0.13). HCMNX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: HCMNX (11 years) vs RWIBX (24 years). HCMNX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RWIBX (1.51). HCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 226.00 vs. RWIBX (44.00). RWIBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMNX: RWIBX (250) vs HCMNX (2500). HCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.32 vs. RWIBX (21.41). RWIBX return over 5 years is better than : 31.20 vs. HCMNX (29.57).
| HCMNX | RWIBX | HCMNX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.51 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.51 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.661 | 15.289 | 50% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 152B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.74 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.32 | 21.41 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.91 | 50.98 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.57 | 31.20 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.19 | 92.57 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement