Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMNX vs RWIBX
HCMNX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts HCMNX vs RWIBX
HCMNX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMNX vs. RWIBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMNX is a Buy and RWIBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. HCMNX (2.02B). RWIBX pays higher dividends than HCMNX: RWIBX (0.70) vs HCMNX (0.13). HCMNX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: HCMNX (12 years) vs RWIBX (24 years). HCMNX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RWIBX (1.51). HCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 226.00 vs. RWIBX (44.00). RWIBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMNX: RWIBX (250) vs HCMNX (2500). HCMNX (10.55) and RWIBX (10.55) have marching annual gain over last year. RWIBX return over 5 years is better than : 28.63 vs. HCMNX (16.90).
| HCMNX | RWIBX | HCMNX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.51 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.51 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.802 | 15.403 | 38% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 158B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.70 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.55 | 10.55 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.11 | 48.09 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.90 | 28.63 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.96 | 90.07 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers