Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMNX vs RWIFX
HCMNX vs RWIFX Comparison
Open Charts HCMNX vs RWIFX
HCMNX vs RWIFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMNX vs. RWIFX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMNX is a Hold and RWIFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. HCMNX (2.04B). RWIFX pays higher dividends than HCMNX: RWIFX (1.57) vs HCMNX (0.13). HCMNX was incepted earlier than RWIFX: HCMNX (11 years) vs RWIFX (24 years). HCMNX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RWIFX (0.46). HCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 226.00 vs. RWIFX (44.00). RWIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMNX: RWIFX (250) vs HCMNX (2500). HCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.65 vs. RWIFX (22.26). RWIFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.12 vs. HCMNX (25.58).
| HCMNX | RWIFX | HCMNX / RWIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.46 | 428% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.46 | 428% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.938 | 15.808 | 38% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 160B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 1.57 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.65 | 22.26 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.37 | 54.76 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.58 | 37.12 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.64 | 112.87 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement