Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMSX vs RGAFX
HCMSX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts HCMSX vs RGAFX
HCMSX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMSX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMSX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. HCMSX (2.18B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than HCMSX: RGAFX (0.46) vs HCMSX (0.00). HCMSX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: HCMSX (12 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). HCMSX (2.76) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). HCMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 264.00 vs. RGAFX (32.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMSX: RGAFX (250) vs HCMSX (2500). HCMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.84 vs. RGAFX (4.67). HCMSX return over 5 years is better than : 38.26 vs. RGAFX (17.46).
| HCMSX | RGAFX | HCMSX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 0.34 | 662% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.76 | 0.34 | 812% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.214 | 7.299 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.18B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.84 | 4.67 | 489% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.06 | 40.73 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.26 | 17.46 | 219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 303.25 | 105.95 | 286% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers