Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMWX vs RWIBX
HCMWX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts HCMWX vs RWIBX
HCMWX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMWX vs. RWIBX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMWX is a Buy and RWIBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. HCMWX (1.95B). RWIBX pays higher dividends than HCMWX: RWIBX (0.71) vs HCMWX (0.01). HCMWX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: HCMWX (11 years) vs RWIBX (24 years). HCMWX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RWIBX (1.51). HCMWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 226.00 vs. RWIBX (44.00). RWIBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMWX: RWIBX (250) vs HCMWX (2500). RWIBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.86 vs. HCMWX (11.98). RWIBX return over 5 years is better than : 27.77 vs. HCMWX (14.03).
| HCMWX | RWIBX | HCMWX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.51 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.51 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.584 | 12.503 | 13% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.95B | 158B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.71 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.98 | 12.86 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.24 | 38.83 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.03 | 27.77 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.82 | 83.93 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers