Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMWX vs RWICX
HCMWX vs RWICX Comparison
Open Charts HCMWX vs RWICX
HCMWX vs RWICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMWX vs. RWICX commentary
Jun 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMWX is a Hold and RWICX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWICX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. HCMWX (2.04B). RWICX pays higher dividends than HCMWX: RWICX (1.09) vs HCMWX (0.01). HCMWX was incepted earlier than RWICX: HCMWX (11 years) vs RWICX (24 years). HCMWX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RWICX (1.06). HCMWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 226.00 vs. RWICX (44.00). RWICX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMWX: RWICX (250) vs HCMWX (2500). HCMWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.95 vs. RWICX (20.99). RWICX return over 5 years is better than : 35.24 vs. HCMWX (27.67).
| HCMWX | RWICX | HCMWX / RWICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.06 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.06 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.882 | 15.546 | 38% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 160B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 1.09 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.95 | 20.99 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.61 | 44.19 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.67 | 35.24 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.54 | 99.15 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement