Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMZX vs RWBEX
HCMZX vs RWBEX Comparison
Open Charts HCMZX vs RWBEX
HCMZX vs RWBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMZX vs. RWBEX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMZX is a Buy and RWBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWBEX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. HCMZX (2.02B). RWBEX pays higher dividends than HCMZX: RWBEX (0.94) vs HCMZX (0.35). HCMZX was incepted earlier than RWBEX: HCMZX (12 years) vs RWBEX (12 years). HCMZX (2.36) is less costly to investors than RWBEX (1.21). HCMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 226.00 vs. RWBEX (44.00). HCMZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWBEX: HCMZX (0) vs RWBEX (250). RWBEX (10.98) and HCMZX (10.84) have marching annual gain over last year. RWBEX return over 5 years is better than : 30.47 vs. HCMZX (17.22).
| HCMZX | RWBEX | HCMZX / RWBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.21 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 1.21 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.816 | 15.629 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 158B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.94 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.84 | 10.98 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.47 | 49.65 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.22 | 30.47 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.14 | 93.22 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers