Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMZX vs RWBEX
HCMZX vs RWBEX Comparison
Open Charts HCMZX vs RWBEX
HCMZX vs RWBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMZX vs. RWBEX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMZX is a Hold and RWBEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWBEX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. HCMZX (2.08B). RWBEX pays higher dividends than HCMZX: RWBEX (0.95) vs HCMZX (0.36). HCMZX was incepted earlier than RWBEX: HCMZX (11 years) vs RWBEX (12 years). HCMZX (2.36) is less costly to investors than RWBEX (1.21). HCMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 226.00 vs. RWBEX (44.00). HCMZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWBEX: HCMZX (0) vs RWBEX (250). HCMZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.48 vs. RWBEX (16.65). RWBEX return over 5 years is better than : 34.64 vs. HCMZX (20.85).
| HCMZX | RWBEX | HCMZX / RWBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.21 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 1.21 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.224 | 16.674 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 156B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.95 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.48 | 16.65 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.70 | 52.70 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.85 | 34.64 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.22 | 90.67 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement