Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMZX vs RWIBX
HCMZX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts HCMZX vs RWIBX
HCMZX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMZX vs. RWIBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMZX is a Buy and RWIBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. HCMZX (2.02B). RWIBX pays higher dividends than HCMZX: RWIBX (0.70) vs HCMZX (0.35). HCMZX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: HCMZX (12 years) vs RWIBX (24 years). HCMZX (2.36) is less costly to investors than RWIBX (1.51). HCMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 226.00 vs. RWIBX (44.00). HCMZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWIBX: HCMZX (0) vs RWIBX (250). HCMZX (10.84) and RWIBX (10.55) have marching annual gain over last year. RWIBX return over 5 years is better than : 28.63 vs. HCMZX (17.22).
| HCMZX | RWIBX | HCMZX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.51 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 1.51 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.816 | 15.403 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 158B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.70 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.84 | 10.55 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.47 | 48.09 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.22 | 28.63 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.14 | 90.07 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers