Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMZX vs RWIBX
HCMZX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts HCMZX vs RWIBX
HCMZX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMZX vs. RWIBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMZX is a StrongBuy and RWIBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. HCMZX (2.08B). RWIBX pays higher dividends than HCMZX: RWIBX (0.74) vs HCMZX (0.35). HCMZX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: HCMZX (11 years) vs RWIBX (24 years). HCMZX (2.36) is less costly to investors than RWIBX (1.51). HCMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 226.00 vs. RWIBX (44.00). HCMZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWIBX: HCMZX (0) vs RWIBX (250). HCMZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.71 vs. RWIBX (21.41). RWIBX (31.20) and HCMZX (29.92) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HCMZX | RWIBX | HCMZX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.51 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 1.51 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.678 | 15.289 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 152B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.74 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.71 | 21.41 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.30 | 50.98 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.92 | 31.20 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.47 | 92.57 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement