Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMZX vs RWICX
HCMZX vs RWICX Comparison
Open Charts HCMZX vs RWICX
HCMZX vs RWICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMZX vs. RWICX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMZX is a Hold and RWICX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWICX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. HCMZX (2B). RWICX pays higher dividends than HCMZX: RWICX (1.09) vs HCMZX (0.36). HCMZX was incepted earlier than RWICX: HCMZX (11 years) vs RWICX (24 years). HCMZX (2.36) is less costly to investors than RWICX (1.06). HCMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 226.00 vs. RWICX (44.00). HCMZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWICX: HCMZX (0) vs RWICX (250). HCMZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.24 vs. RWICX (15.18). RWICX return over 5 years is better than : 31.44 vs. HCMZX (18.00).
| HCMZX | RWICX | HCMZX / RWICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.06 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 1.06 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.180 | 13.814 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2B | 158B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 1.09 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.24 | 15.18 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.55 | 42.71 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.00 | 31.44 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.04 | 91.15 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement