Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMZX vs RWICX
HCMZX vs RWICX Comparison
Open Charts HCMZX vs RWICX
HCMZX vs RWICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMZX vs. RWICX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMZX is a Hold and RWICX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWICX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. HCMZX (2.04B). RWICX pays higher dividends than HCMZX: RWICX (1.09) vs HCMZX (0.35). HCMZX was incepted earlier than RWICX: HCMZX (11 years) vs RWICX (24 years). HCMZX (2.36) is less costly to investors than RWICX (1.06). HCMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 226.00 vs. RWICX (44.00). HCMZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWICX: HCMZX (0) vs RWICX (250). HCMZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.03 vs. RWICX (18.44). RWICX return over 5 years is better than : 30.33 vs. HCMZX (25.92).
| HCMZX | RWICX | HCMZX / RWICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.06 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 1.06 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.952 | 13.260 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 160B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 1.09 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.03 | 18.44 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.74 | 48.89 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.92 | 30.33 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.92 | 102.66 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement