Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMZX vs RWIFX
HCMZX vs RWIFX Comparison
Open Charts HCMZX vs RWIFX
HCMZX vs RWIFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMZX vs. RWIFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMZX is a Hold and RWIFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. HCMZX (2.06B). RWIFX pays higher dividends than HCMZX: RWIFX (1.58) vs HCMZX (0.35). HCMZX was incepted earlier than RWIFX: HCMZX (11 years) vs RWIFX (24 years). HCMZX (2.36) is less costly to investors than RWIFX (0.46). HCMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 226.00 vs. RWIFX (44.00). HCMZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWIFX: HCMZX (0) vs RWIFX (250). HCMZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.77 vs. RWIFX (14.51). RWIFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.89 vs. HCMZX (21.68).
| HCMZX | RWIFX | HCMZX / RWIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.46 | 404% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 0.46 | 513% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.770 | 13.411 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 158B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 1.58 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.77 | 14.51 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.25 | 45.55 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.68 | 32.89 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.03 | 95.65 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers