Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCPCX vs RWMFX
HCPCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts HCPCX vs RWMFX
HCPCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCPCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCPCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. HCPCX (3.73B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than HCPCX: RWMFX (1.42) vs HCPCX (0.11). HCPCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: HCPCX (12 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). HCPCX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). HCPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). HCPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: HCPCX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.41 vs. HCPCX (2.32). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 29.43 vs. HCPCX (0.74).
| HCPCX | RWMFX | HCPCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.31 | 381% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.31 | 381% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.825 | 6.703 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.73B | 218B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 1.42 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.32 | 7.41 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.55 | 34.32 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.74 | 29.43 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.69 | 80.84 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers