Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGBX vs RMEBX
HDGBX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HDGBX vs RMEBX
HDGBX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGBX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGBX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HDGBX (3.52B). HDGBX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HDGBX (1.06) vs RMEBX (1.00). HDGBX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HDGBX (28 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HDGBX (0.91). HDGBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). HDGBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: HDGBX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.65 vs. HDGBX (2.66). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.34 vs. HDGBX (2.88).
| HDGBX | RMEBX | HDGBX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.07 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.07 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.023 | 9.110 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.52B | 117B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.00 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.66 | 8.65 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.22 | 36.95 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.88 | 36.34 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.78 | 91.61 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement