Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGBX vs RMEBX
HDGBX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HDGBX vs RMEBX
HDGBX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGBX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 08, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGBX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HDGBX (3.59B). HDGBX (1.02) and RMEBX (0.99) have matching dividends . HDGBX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HDGBX (28 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HDGBX (0.91). HDGBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). HDGBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: HDGBX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.17 vs. HDGBX (9.18). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 38.07 vs. HDGBX (4.97).
| HDGBX | RMEBX | HDGBX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.07 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.07 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.405 | 11.504 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.59B | 118B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.99 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.18 | 11.17 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.21 | 36.30 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.97 | 38.07 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.87 | 92.87 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement