Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGBX vs RMEBX
HDGBX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HDGBX vs RMEBX
HDGBX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGBX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGBX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HDGBX (3.55B). HDGBX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HDGBX (1.10) vs RMEBX (0.99). HDGBX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HDGBX (28 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HDGBX (0.91). HDGBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). HDGBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: HDGBX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.37 vs. HDGBX (4.09). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.55 vs. HDGBX (-9.49).
| HDGBX | RMEBX | HDGBX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.07 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.07 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.088 | 9.484 | -22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.55B | 118B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.99 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.09 | 7.37 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.49 | 36.25 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.49 | 33.55 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.77 | 88.62 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement