Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGBX vs RMFCX
HDGBX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGBX vs RMFCX
Hartford Dividend and Growth HLS IB
Price$22.25
Change-$0.05 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.33B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.93
Change-$0.21 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.19B
HDGBX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGBX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGBX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. HDGBX (3.33B). HDGBX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HDGBX (1.52) vs RMFCX (1.21). HDGBX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGBX (28 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). HDGBX (0.91) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . HDGBX (31.00) and RMFCX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. HDGBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: HDGBX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.59 vs. HDGBX (-7.90). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.85 vs. HDGBX (11.23).
| HDGBX | RMFCX | HDGBX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.720 | 12.617 | -29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.33B | 110B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 1.21 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.90 | 5.59 | -141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.40 | 27.75 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.23 | 51.85 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.71 | 84.46 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers