Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGBX vs RMFCX
HDGBX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGBX vs RMFCX
Hartford Dividend and Growth HLS IB
Price$21.62
Change+$0.13 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.31B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
HDGBX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGBX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGBX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. HDGBX (3.31B). HDGBX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HDGBX (1.57) vs RMFCX (1.24). HDGBX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGBX (27 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). HDGBX (0.91) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . HDGBX (31.00) and RMFCX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. HDGBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: HDGBX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.71 vs. HDGBX (-7.54). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.41 vs. HDGBX (16.13).
| HDGBX | RMFCX | HDGBX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.446 | 11.421 | -56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.31B | 109B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.24 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.54 | 7.71 | -98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.41 | 32.16 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.13 | 56.41 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.61 | 91.12 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement