Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGBX vs RMFCX
HDGBX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGBX vs RMFCX
HDGBX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGBX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGBX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HDGBX (3.55B). RMFCX (1.15) and HDGBX (1.10) have matching dividends . HDGBX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGBX (28 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HDGBX (0.91) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . HDGBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). HDGBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: HDGBX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.51 vs. HDGBX (4.09). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.46 vs. HDGBX (-9.49).
| HDGBX | RMFCX | HDGBX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.088 | 9.582 | -22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.55B | 118B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.15 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.09 | 7.51 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.49 | 36.80 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.49 | 34.46 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.77 | 90.34 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement