Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGBX vs RMFCX
HDGBX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGBX vs RMFCX
HDGBX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGBX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGBX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HDGBX (3.52B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than HDGBX: RMFCX (1.16) vs HDGBX (1.06). HDGBX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGBX (28 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HDGBX (0.91) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . HDGBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). HDGBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: HDGBX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.78 vs. HDGBX (2.66). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.32 vs. HDGBX (2.88).
| HDGBX | RMFCX | HDGBX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.023 | 9.189 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.52B | 117B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.16 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.66 | 8.78 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.22 | 37.51 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.88 | 37.32 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.78 | 93.35 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement