Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGBX vs RMFEX
HDGBX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts HDGBX vs RMFEX
HDGBX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGBX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGBX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HDGBX (3.55B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than HDGBX: RMFEX (1.41) vs HDGBX (1.10). HDGBX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: HDGBX (28 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). HDGBX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). HDGBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). HDGBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: HDGBX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.86 vs. HDGBX (4.09). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 36.62 vs. HDGBX (-9.49).
| HDGBX | RMFEX | HDGBX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.62 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.62 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.088 | 9.813 | -21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.55B | 118B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.41 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.09 | 7.86 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.49 | 38.09 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.49 | 36.62 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.77 | 98.47 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement