Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGBX vs RMFEX
HDGBX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts HDGBX vs RMFEX
HDGBX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGBX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGBX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HDGBX (3.52B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than HDGBX: RMFEX (1.42) vs HDGBX (1.06). HDGBX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: HDGBX (28 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). HDGBX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). HDGBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). HDGBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: HDGBX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.15 vs. HDGBX (2.66). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.48 vs. HDGBX (2.88).
| HDGBX | RMFEX | HDGBX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.62 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.62 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.023 | 9.354 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.52B | 117B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.42 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.66 | 9.15 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.22 | 38.81 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.88 | 39.48 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.78 | 101.57 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement