Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGBX vs RMFEX
HDGBX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts HDGBX vs RMFEX
HDGBX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGBX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 08, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGBX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HDGBX (3.59B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than HDGBX: RMFEX (1.41) vs HDGBX (1.02). HDGBX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: HDGBX (28 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). HDGBX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). HDGBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). HDGBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: HDGBX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.65 vs. HDGBX (9.18). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 41.24 vs. HDGBX (4.97).
| HDGBX | RMFEX | HDGBX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.62 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.62 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.405 | 11.786 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.59B | 118B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.41 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.18 | 11.65 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.21 | 38.14 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.97 | 41.24 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.87 | 102.85 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement