Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGCX vs RMEBX
HDGCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HDGCX vs RMEBX
Hartford Dividend and Growth C
Price$34.07
Change-$0.04 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.89B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.71
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
HDGCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. HDGCX (17.9B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than HDGCX: RMEBX (1.09) vs HDGCX (0.72). HDGCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HDGCX (27 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). HDGCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. HDGCX (28.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGCX: RMEBX (250) vs HDGCX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. HDGCX (-1.00). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.11 vs. HDGCX (43.71).
| HDGCX | RMEBX | HDGCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 1.07 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 1.07 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.344 | 11.179 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.9B | 109B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.09 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.00 | 7.45 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.22 | 31.44 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.71 | 55.11 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.90 | 89.18 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement