Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGCX vs RMEBX
HDGCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HDGCX vs RMEBX
Hartford Dividend and Growth C
Price$31.71
Change-$0.12 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.33B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.32
Change-$0.14 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.21B
HDGCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGCX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. HDGCX (17.3B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than HDGCX: RMEBX (1.21) vs HDGCX (0.77). HDGCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HDGCX (27 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). HDGCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. HDGCX (28.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGCX: RMEBX (250) vs HDGCX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.09 vs. HDGCX (-6.13). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.06 vs. HDGCX (49.87).
| HDGCX | RMEBX | HDGCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 1.07 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 1.07 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.977 | 2.865 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.3B | 103B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.21 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.13 | 5.09 | -120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.44 | 17.98 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.87 | 58.06 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.52 | 60.34 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement