Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGCX vs RMEBX
HDGCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HDGCX vs RMEBX
HDGCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HDGCX (19B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than HDGCX: RMEBX (0.99) vs HDGCX (0.30). HDGCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HDGCX (28 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). HDGCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). HDGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGCX: RMEBX (250) vs HDGCX (2000). HDGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.45 vs. RMEBX (9.03). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.75 vs. HDGCX (20.12).
| HDGCX | RMEBX | HDGCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.07 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.07 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.602 | 10.367 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19B | 118B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.99 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.45 | 9.03 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.38 | 38.30 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.12 | 35.75 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.52 | 90.55 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement