Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGCX vs RMEBX
HDGCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HDGCX vs RMEBX
HDGCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HDGCX (18.4B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than HDGCX: RMEBX (1.04) vs HDGCX (0.38). HDGCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HDGCX (28 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). HDGCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). HDGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGCX: RMEBX (250) vs HDGCX (2000). HDGCX (9.54) and RMEBX (9.11) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. HDGCX (18.27).
| HDGCX | RMEBX | HDGCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.07 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.07 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.062 | 6.308 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.4B | 117B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 1.04 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.54 | 9.11 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.69 | 34.37 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.27 | 34.74 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.67 | 94.33 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement