Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGCX vs RMFCX
HDGCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGCX vs RMFCX
Hartford Dividend and Growth C
Price$31.71
Change-$0.12 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.33B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$56.01
Change-$0.14 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.21B
HDGCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGCX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. HDGCX (17.3B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than HDGCX: RMFCX (1.37) vs HDGCX (0.77). HDGCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGCX (27 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). HDGCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. HDGCX (28.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGCX: RMFCX (250) vs HDGCX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.22 vs. HDGCX (-6.13). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.17 vs. HDGCX (49.87).
| HDGCX | RMFCX | HDGCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.91 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.91 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.977 | 2.924 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.3B | 103B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.37 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.13 | 5.22 | -117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.44 | 18.48 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.87 | 59.17 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.52 | 61.78 | 53% |