Ad is loading...
HDGCX vs RMFCX
HDGCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGCX vs RMFCX
Hartford Dividend and Growth C
Price$30.20
Change+$0.52 (+1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.5B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.96
Change+$0.76 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
HDGCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. HDGCX (16.5B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than HDGCX: RMFCX (1.34) vs HDGCX (0.75). HDGCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGCX (27 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). HDGCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. HDGCX (28.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGCX: RMFCX (250) vs HDGCX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.87 vs. HDGCX (-8.90). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.32 vs. HDGCX (43.43).
| HDGCX | RMFCX | HDGCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.91 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.91 | 191% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.844 | -2.681 | 218% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.5B | 95.8B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.34 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.90 | 1.87 | -475% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.32 | 6.27 | -85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.43 | 53.32 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.71 | 54.78 | 47% |