Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGCX vs RMFCX
HDGCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGCX vs RMFCX
HDGCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGCX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. HDGCX (18.6B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than HDGCX: RMFCX (1.19) vs HDGCX (0.38). HDGCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGCX (28 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HDGCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HDGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGCX: RMFCX (250) vs HDGCX (2000). RMFCX (10.31) and HDGCX (9.99) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.04 vs. HDGCX (16.93).
| HDGCX | RMFCX | HDGCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.91 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.91 | 191% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.339 | 6.510 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.6B | 115B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 1.19 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.99 | 10.31 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.75 | 35.49 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.93 | 34.04 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.44 | 92.67 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement