Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGCX vs RMFCX
HDGCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGCX vs RMFCX
HDGCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGCX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HDGCX (19B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than HDGCX: RMFCX (1.15) vs HDGCX (0.30). HDGCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGCX (28 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HDGCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HDGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGCX: RMFCX (250) vs HDGCX (2000). HDGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.45 vs. RMFCX (9.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. HDGCX (20.12).
| HDGCX | RMFCX | HDGCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.91 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.91 | 191% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.602 | 10.454 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19B | 118B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 1.15 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.45 | 9.14 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.38 | 38.82 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.12 | 36.70 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.52 | 92.27 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers