Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGCX vs RMFEX
HDGCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts HDGCX vs RMFEX
HDGCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGCX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HDGCX (19B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than HDGCX: RMFEX (1.41) vs HDGCX (0.30). HDGCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: HDGCX (28 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). HDGCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). HDGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGCX: RMFEX (250) vs HDGCX (2000). HDGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.45 vs. RMFEX (9.52). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.89 vs. HDGCX (20.12).
| HDGCX | RMFEX | HDGCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.62 | 281% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.62 | 281% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.602 | 10.681 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19B | 118B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 1.41 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.45 | 9.52 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.38 | 40.18 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.12 | 38.89 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.52 | 100.46 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement