Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGFX vs RMEBX
HDGFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HDGFX vs RMEBX
HDGFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGFX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HDGFX (19.1B). HDGFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HDGFX (1.17) vs RMEBX (0.99). HDGFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HDGFX (9 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HDGFX (0.63). HDGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGFX: RMEBX (250) vs HDGFX (1000000). HDGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.85 vs. RMEBX (10.33). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 37.20 vs. HDGFX (28.70).
| HDGFX | RMEBX | HDGFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.896 | 11.912 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.1B | 118B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.99 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.85 | 10.33 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.22 | 37.21 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.70 | 37.20 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers