Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGFX vs RMEBX
HDGFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HDGFX vs RMEBX
HDGFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGFX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. HDGFX (18.6B). HDGFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HDGFX (1.26) vs RMEBX (1.04). HDGFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HDGFX (9 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HDGFX (0.63). HDGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGFX: RMEBX (250) vs HDGFX (1000000). HDGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.78 vs. RMEBX (9.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. HDGFX (25.20).
| HDGFX | RMEBX | HDGFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.796 | 5.801 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.6B | 115B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.04 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.78 | 9.98 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.05 | 34.14 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.20 | 32.93 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement