Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGFX vs RMEBX
HDGFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HDGFX vs RMEBX
HDGFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGFX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HDGFX (18.5B). HDGFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HDGFX (1.21) vs RMEBX (1.00). HDGFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HDGFX (9 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HDGFX (0.63). HDGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGFX: RMEBX (250) vs HDGFX (1000000). HDGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.67 vs. RMEBX (9.13). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.55 vs. HDGFX (26.92).
| HDGFX | RMEBX | HDGFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.944 | 8.804 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.5B | 118B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.00 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.67 | 9.13 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.07 | 33.99 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.92 | 36.55 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 88.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers