Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGFX vs RMEBX
HDGFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HDGFX vs RMEBX
HDGFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGFX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HDGFX (18.8B). HDGFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HDGFX (1.15) vs RMEBX (0.99). HDGFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HDGFX (10 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HDGFX (0.63). HDGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGFX: RMEBX (250) vs HDGFX (1000000). HDGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.92 vs. RMEBX (8.27). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.04 vs. HDGFX (26.53).
| HDGFX | RMEBX | HDGFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.041 | 9.891 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.8B | 118B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.99 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.92 | 8.27 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.90 | 35.57 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.53 | 34.04 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers